| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush Pentagon Opens Propaganda Office for Iraq/Afganistan News Unhappy with free-press outlets of information, the Pentagon has decided to start its own news service focusing on the successes in Iraq/Afganistan. The government-funded news service will be given $6.3 million to start and be evaluated after a few months. So much for the free press. Source: TheTip/Reuters, 2004-02-27 Candidate: Big Government KUWAIT CITY, Kuwait - The U.S. military will launch its own news service in Iraq and Afghanistan to send military video, text and photos directly to the Internet or news outlets. The $6.3 million project, expected to begin operating in April, is one of the largest military public affairs projects in recent memory, and is intended to allow small media outlets in the United States and elsewhere to bypass what the Pentagon views as an increasingly combative press corps. U.S. officials have complained that Iraq-based media focuses on catastrophic events such as car bombs and soldiers' deaths, while giving short shrift to U.S. rebuilding efforts. The American public "currently gets a pretty slanted picture," said Army Capt. Randall Baucom, a spokesman for the Kuwait-based U.S.-led Coalition Land Forces Command. "We want them to get an opportunity to see the facts as they exist, instead of getting information from people who aren't on the scene." The project, called Digital Video and Imagery Distribution System or DVIDS, will also give the Pentagon more control of the coverage when calamities do happen. Army camera teams will be able to use their access to battle zones or military bases to film the aftermath of rebel attacks on U.S. troops — or U.S. raids on insurgent targets — and then offer free pictures to news outlets within two hours. At times civilian media are kept away from such events. "We have an unfair advantage," Baucom said. "We're going to be able to get closer to the incident and provide better spokespeople to give the right information. The important thing is that we provide the public with accurate information." But media analysts argued that the military has a vested interest in making sure its viewpoint is heard. "The Army wants to get their view across and they are using a technique as old as any public relations manuever ever devised," said Aly Colon, an ethics group leader at the Poynter Institute, the journalism research and education center in St. Petersburg, Fla. "I would view the Army's decison, in the same way that I would view OPEC creating a communications system to help the American public understand what it means when prices go up," he said. "This is the kind of news that people get in countries where the government controls the media. Why would anybody here want to buy into it?" Mac McKerral, president of the Society of Professional Journalists, told The Associated Press. The Army is in the midst of contracting to outfit five Mobile Public Affairs Detachments with a suitcase-sized reporting kit containing digital video and still cameras, a laptop computer and a Norsat NewsLink 3200 satellite broadcast terminal. Four teams will be based in Iraq and one in Afghanistan. Much of the effort is aimed at packaging and shipping locally focused stories to small and medium-sized newspapers and TV stations in the United States, said Army Col. Rick Thomas, who heads the effort. Most small U.S. media outlets can't afford to send a reporter to Iraq to cover a local military unit, Thomas said. Since the ongoing troop rotation involves several Army National Guard and Reserve units from communities across the United States, there are small media outlets who might never get news of their neighbors' work in Iraq. "The vast majority are dependent on other news organizations to get their products," Thomas said. "We think we can give them some more focused copy. We can shoot video of someone from, say, Tupelo, Miss., and they've got what looks like a very good hometown piece." The military brass was surprised and impressed with the speed and immediacy of the coverage of journalists embedded with U.S. combat units during the war, and wanted to develop the same capabilities, Thomas said. Television crews demonstrated their equipment for Army public affairs teams, and Thomas said his staff compiled a list of equipment needed to cover breaking news. The Army already has dozens of its own reporters in Iraq and Afghanistan writing for internal newsletters and magazines. Thomas said he hopes civilian media can reuse the same stories, or at least the Army's photos and video. The military's reporters will transmit their stories and video to servers at Third Army headquarters in Atlanta, and allow access to them over a password-protected Internet site, Baucom said. Accredited news organizations will be allowed to register for free access, he said. Thomas said the military also plans to use the equipment for internal video, such as beaming pictures from an aircraft's gun camera to a Pentagon briefing. The DVIDS units will also make it easier to get positive stories published, Thomas said. "There are numerous good news stories that aren't told that do provide a better balance on the overall successes we achieved in Iraq," he said. "We'll be able to provide the option for those types of stories. They're not going to lead in a major daily newspaper, but they'll play well in smaller daily papers and especially weekly papers." Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: From: USAFARTS 2004-06-08 18:49:45 mike e, what planet are you on freak? you going to get this site closed down? put up or shut up pal. go on, shut it down! i dare ya. i double dare ya. hahahaha, what a lame prick. this site would present both sides of the story, if you would just stfu for a while so that we can read what others think for a change, instead of trying to shut everyone up by boring them to death with your tired old cr-p. you really need to get a life pal, because the one you got totally s--ks. From: 2004-06-08 07:31:51 mike e, this site is already full of your garbage.wtf are you on about? get a job you bum. btw you fricken brain surgeon, liberals don't have any doctrine to follow, thats what makes them liberal. From: 2004-06-08 07:28:14 im all for post natal abortion. lets start with mike e. From: 2004-06-05 12:41:34 -------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ from: mike e now, are we going to have a *forum*, where both sides of an issue can be brought up? is this going to be a site that allows free speech? or is this site going to *continue* to get rid of my posts the day after they are put up? because i can load up each subject title every day, until you have to shut down this site! if i can not speak out against your propaganda, if i not have free speech, why should i play by the rules of ettiquite? up to now, i have only visited this site occasionally. but i can make it my business to do this *every* day! also, someone threatened that "the administrators can block your postings, it is easy to do." i really hope you do that, because *then* i have a legal case of a free speech violation and we can get rid of this site. but to that moron who said that, you couldn`t do it anyway, because i can use 10 different emails and send from 10 different locations, haha. unless you want to make the site private and just talk to yourselves, which is all you`re doing anyway, i`m one of only a handful of people who acually use their brain and think and not goose-step to the same liberal drum that beats "you must be in lock-step with us. you must have a knee-jerk reaction every day that promotes hatred for bush. you must say everything he has ever done is evil and wrong. he only cares about oil and making his rich freinds richer. he probably planned and executed 9-11. all republicans bad, all democrats good. all wealthy people are evil and made their money by taking the blood from the poor. (unless they are liberal) you have no idea, do you, how ridiculous you sound! but i need a laugh. so, either i have my freedom of speech, where people can read my posts, like everyone else on this site, like americans, or i don`t, it`s up to you. ------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------- From: 2004-06-05 11:49:09 from: mike e zell miller and joeseph lieberman are the only *real* democrats left in that joke of a party. the founding fathers, even jack kennedy, are rolling over in their graves that these socialist scum, like kerry, would use the word "democrat" for the way they act, the laws they p-ss, the judges they elect.why do i use such a strong word? i`ll tell you. they have already done so much damage to this country it`s going to take a generation to get rid of the stench of the clinton years and longer to get rid of those judges. but people see that now, from the decimation of our military, to one of the many clinton-appointed judges in san francisco (sodom) that is fight`ing so hard to make sure a 9 month-old baby, still in the womb, can legally have it`s skull crushed and it`s brain s--ked out to avoid it`s "mother" being a little "depressed". oh yes, we must avoid that at all costs! we cant have women running around "depressed"! as a matter of fact, i know that a lot of women get depressed after the normal birth of a baby. perhaps a liberal president like john kerry can do those women a favor and get a law p-ssed where a woman can get that same "procedure", as they call it, done to her week-old newborn! i don`t see the difference, except for a week. |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |