| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush Kerry's Taking The Fall Six weeks after the 911 Commission Report is published, the silence is deafening...Where is the outrage? Source: The TIP, 2004-09-13 Candidate: Democratic Party Elizabeth Dru's review of the 911 Commission Report is published in the New York Book Review this week. She seems to be the only journalist interested in reading the whole thing and reviewing it...the only one who believes its important enough. But this review is not going to be read by the Average American Voter(AAV). The AAV doesn't read the New York Book Review. Dru's article needs to be in People, US, the Enquirer! Any manuscript that will end up in a barber shop, beauty parlor or dentist office. I've never seen the New York Book Review at the Pediatricians! Well, alright, the "Media" is either or both asleep or bought-off. We understand that. But what about John Kerry/John Edwards? Not a peep? According to Dru, the Commission Report does not containn any conclusions. The Strength and the Weakness of the Commission was its bi-partisanship-ness. (I would have preferred non-partisanship-ness, but that concept is completely foreign to our government.)Strength because the commission acquired credibility and access through bi-partisanship. Weakness because it forced the commissioners to bow to the sensibilities of the "other team", not pointing fingers, not laying blame. So, when the White House was finally FORCED to give the commission access to the Presidential Daily Briefings, to know What the President knew and When he knew it, the now famous memo titled "Bin Laden determined to attack the United States" was revealed. Both National Security Advisor Condaleezza Rice and President Bush are on record as considering this bit of intelligence, given to them more than a month before the attack on the Towers, historical. (Bin Laden USED to be determined to attack the US?) And so the record stands. Except, according to the Commission Report, the CIA agents that prepared that bit of "history" didn't consider it historic at all. The record doesn't stand there at all! The record is now, No, the memo was NOT historic, and anyone claiming it was is both 1)incompetant and 2)covering their asses. The 911 Commission did not draw conclusions. It expected the media to do its job. Clearly, the media is not. But what about John Kerry? George Bush is basing his claim to another four years soley on the premise that he protected us on 911 and he's protecting us today. That is a lie. The very fact that 911 is now part of the American Consciousness is proof positive that Bush et al did NOT protect us then. And the rising incidents of terrorist activities is proof positive that Bush's policies are not protecting us today. Bush can't run on domestic policies. Everything he's done has turned to dust, or worse. So, why the silence from the Democrats? The fix is in. Kerry's taking a dive. Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: From: Life is Good 2006-11-11 00:00:00 life is just good now that we have a new look in the whitehouse... it's good i tell ya From: Shelby Longmire 2006-11-01 00:00:00 4-16-2004- you wrote- john kerry is slow to anger, but when he finally arrives, he knows how to make his point.~and your party still needs to distance itself from him! and, america needs to distance itself from your party- "the neocoms"- from a neocon |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |