| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush California Denied Right to Pass Clean Air Laws In yet another environmental loss and big-bussiness gains, the supreme court says that California's clean air comission can't set standards for fleet vehicles emissions. Source: Associated Press, 2004-04-29 Candidate: Judiciary The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Southern California's clean-air agency may have overstepped its authority in imposing its own anti-smog rules for city buses, airport shuttles and other vehicles. In an 8-1 ruling, the court said regulators did not have the right to impose rules requiring private fleets to use engines that burn clean fuel and produce low emissions. It said a lower court would rule on whether the regulations could be applied to public fleets. The rules were imposed in 2000 by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, which regulates air quality in Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange counties. The regulations were intended to help bring the region's worst-in-the-nation air into compliance with federal requirements by 2010. The region could lose billions in highway funds for missing the deadline. "L.A. really needs every tool available to clean up its air, and this will really be a significant impediment to doing so," Emily Figdor, a clean air advocate for Environment California, said of the court decision. Wednesday's ruling was a win for oil companies and diesel engine manufacturers that claimed the local pollution rules conflicted with national standards. However, the ruling will have little immediate effect because only a few of the vehicles currently being regulated are in private fleets, AQMD spokesman Sam Atwood said. The restrictions apply mostly to fleets of vehicles such as buses, garbage trucks, street sweepers, airport shuttles and taxi cabs. More than 5,500 clean-fuel, heavy-duty vehicles and more than 3,400 low-emission passenger vehicles have replaced old vehicles since the rules took effect. The U.S. District Court in Los Angeles will rule on the public fleets issue. The AQMD hopes it will allow the agency to regulate state-owned or contracted vehicles along with vehicles such as airport shuttles and taxis licensed by public agencies. Justice Antonin Scalia , writing for the court, said the emission rules appear to blocked by the federal Clean Air Act. "If one state or political subdivision may enact such rules, then so may any other; and the end result would undo Congress's carefully calibrated regulatory scheme," he wrote. The act gives states some authority to set their own rules, but the plaintiffs said it did not allow a local regulatory agency like the AQMD to set standards. Jed Mandel, president of the Engine Manufacturers Association, one of the plaintiffs, said the AQMD had no authority to regulate fleets owned by other public entities like the city of Los Angeles. Mandel said the court ruling was a victory for consumers and clean air. Engines mandated by the regulations were no cleaner than the diesel-burning engines they replaced, he added. The AQMD, however, said heavy-duty diesel fuel engines, including those targeted by the regulations, are responsible for 70 percent of the total cancer risk from air pollution in California. Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |