TheTip.org
Username:
Password:

Not a member?
Signup!
Polls Members Refer Forums Write for TheTip! Home Impeach Bush




Impeach George Bush


Army Delays Retirements for Some Units.

Order Affects Members Set to Deploy Within 90 Days The Army will prevent soldiers in units set to deploy to Iraq and Afghanistan from leaving the service at the end of their terms, a top general said Wednesday.

Source: AP/The TIP, 2004-06-02

Candidate: Donald Rumsfeld

The announcement, an expansion of an Army program called "stop-loss," means that thousands of soldiers who had expected to retire or otherwise leave the military will have to stay on for the duration of their deployment to those combat zones.

Some criticize the stop-loss program as contrary to the concept of an all-volunteer military force. Presidential nominee Senator John Kerry said a soldier forced to continue serving past his expected date of mustering-out is no longer a volunteer.

Volunteers who are no longer serving voluntarily have become involuntary servants - slaves - while others who have not served at all continue to escape any military service.

Soldiers planning to retire and get on with their lives now face months away from their families and homes.

In an opinion piece in Wednesday's New York Times, Andrew Exum, a former Army captain who served under Hagenbeck in the 10th Mountain Division in Afghanistan, called the treatment of soldiers under stop-loss progr
ams "shameful."

"Many, if not most, of the soldiers in this latest Iraq-bound wave are already veterans of several tours in Iraq and Afghanistan," he wrote. "They have honorably completed their active duty obligations. But like draftees, they have been conscripted to meet the additional needs in Iraq."

Hagenbeck said the stop-loss move is necessary only because the Army is also undergoing the major reorganization that is the brainchild of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and that requires some units to be taken off-line while they are restructured.

The expansion affects units that are 90 days away or less from deploying, said Lt. Gen. Frank L. "Buster" Hagenbeck, the Army's deputy chief of staff for personnel. Commanders have the ability to make exceptions for soldiers with special circumstances; otherwise, soldiers won't be able to leave the service or transfer from their unit until they return to their home base after the deployment.

The move will allow the Army to ke
ep units together as they deploy, Hagenbeck said. Units with new recruits or recently transferred soldiers would not perform as well because the troops would not have had time to work together.

"The rationale is to have cohesive, trained units going to war together," Hagenbeck said.

Previously, the Army had prevented soldiers from leaving certain units scheduled for deployment to Afghanistan or Iraq. But Wednesday's move is the first time since Sept. 11, 2001, that the stop-loss program has been ordered so widely.

The announcement comes as the Army is struggling to find fresh units to continue the occupation of Iraq. Almost every Army combat unit has faced or will face deployment there or in Afghanistan, and increased violence has forced the deployment of an additional 20,000 troops to the region, straining units even further.

Hagenbeck had no numbers on how many soldiers would be affected.
Without the program, an average division would have to replace 4,000 soldiers - per
haps one-quarter to one-fifth of its strength - before or during a deployment, according an Army press release.

Add a comment to this Message in our Forums.
While you're at it, check out our forums too!
Add your Comments to this article
Display Name:


User Originated Comments:


From:
2005-01-20 17:16:49
to enlist in the military is a contract with the
department of defense and when your contract
expires you should be done with your obligation.
the federal government handles contracts in the
same manner. the defense department knows when
these troops are scheduled to return and should
have fresh troops to take there place. a great
idea is to send george w bush, dick cheney and
donald rumsfeld and allow them pull their duty.
lets let the affluent folks get involved in the
defense of our country.



Send this article to:
Your Email:

Related News

7-25-2005
Collateral Damage, Repression, Whatever
10-5-2004
Rumsfeld Spills the Beans
8-27-2004
Rumsfeld Knew
6-21-2004
Rumsfeld "Depends On What the Definition of "IS" Is."
6-17-2004
Rumsfeld = War Criminal
5-16-2004
Seymour Hersch did the work
5-14-2004
When the New York Post turns on Rummy...
5-9-2004
Soldiers' Warnings Ignored
4-7-2004
Rumsfeld - More Troops Please
11-29-2003
Suicides Plague Iraqi Troops
8-31-2003
Taliban Back
8-25-2003
Iraq Guerilla War - Rumsfeld
7-1-2003
Rumsfeld Defines "Guerilla"
12-3-2002
UN Inspectors - Secret Service Sado-Masochists?
10-1-2002
CIA Involved in Iraqi Bio Weapons Program
1-6-2002
10 Million March to Stop War February 15











Donate some Clicks!













This RingSurf The Political Science and Politics Webring Net Ring
owned by TheTIP.

[ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ]

NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org.

Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally.