| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush Cheney's Bad Breath Mr. Cheney's potty mouth is just too easy a target. Suffice it to say, Mrs. Cheney should have washed his mouth out with soap years ago. Source: The TIP, 2004-06-26 Candidate: Dick Cheney Vice President Dick Cheney said Friday he had no regrets about a bitter exchange with Democratic Sen. Patrick Leahy in which the vice president used an obscenity. Cheney, on a campaign swing through the Midwest battleground states of Iowa and Michigan, hurled the "F-word" at Leahy during a conversation between the two Tuesday, according to congressional aides. Asked if he cursed the Vermont senator, Cheney told the Fox News program, the Cavuto Report, "Probably." But he said "No" when asked whether he regretted it. "I expressed myself rather forcefully, felt better after I had done it," Cheney said. Obviously, this is where we must part company. "Go fuck yourself!" is not expressing oneself forcefully. It is what stupid people say when they're too old to cry. It has no meaning. Just what was Cheney telling Leahy to do? Fucking oneself is, unless one is an hermaphrodite with amazing sexual organs, quite impossible. Cheney's directions to Leahy, unless Cheney was suggesting that Leahy is such a person, remains unclear. According to congressional aides, Leahy said hello to Cheney after a photo session on the senate floor. Cheney, who is president of the Senate, and apparently very touchy these days, then ripped into Leahy for the Democratic senator's criticism this week of alleged war profiteering in Iraq by Halliburton, the oil services company that Cheney once ran and from which Cheney continues to reap profits. Leahy, then noted Republican hypocrisy by reminding Cheney how Republicans had accused Democrats of being anti-Catholic, because they are opposed to some of President Bush's anti-abortion judges, the aides said. That's when Cheney, obviously unable to justify such hypocrisy, used the obscenity in telling Leahy what he could do. "I expressed my unhappiness with the way he's been conducting himself," Cheney told Fox. "He had challenged my integrity and I didn't like that. But most of all I didn't like the fact that after he'd done so that he wanted to act like everything is peaches and cream and I informed him of my view of his conduct." Cheney said that was not the "kind of language I usually use." Cheney then took cover in the second oldest excuse ("my dog at my homework" being number one) that "everyone else does it") saying "I think a lot of my colleagues felt what I had said badly needed to be said, that it was long overdue." On Capitol Hill, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, a Tennessee Republican, bravely stepped forward to defend his man - he declined to comment on Cheney's remarks "I didn't hear them." Adding to the Republican hypocrisy, Frist told reporters, "Civility? We need more of it in the Senate ... and probably in Washington, D.C., generally." The flap overshadowed a day of campaigning in which Cheney hoped to spotlight the economy. Still hoping to change the subject, he said "America's economy is moving in the right direction -- and don't let anyone tell you otherwise." Cheney, who has never let facts get in the way of rhetoric, was clearly preparing his audience for the next day when it was announced that the government report hailing the first quarter economic growth at 4.4% was revised downward to 3.9%. Later, at a rally in Sioux Falls, Iowa, Cheney participated in some more name-calling, attacking Democratic presidential challenger John Kerry as the candidate of "malaise" -- an attempt to liken him to former President Jimmy Carter. Carter and Kerry do have a lot in common. Carter and Kerry both served their country honorably in war - Carter in the Navy, Kerry in the Army. And, of course, Bush and Cheney also have a common bond - they both avoided service - Cheney by furiously finagling three, four, oh! Five deferrments - then finally hatching his mis-begotten brood in a real display of Planned Parenthood; and Bush by languishing in Texas in a drunken stupor for three years. Critics say the task force secretly formed policy that was favorable to the energy industry. But Cheney replied, "Some people say, secrecy, secrecy, secrecy. You can't run the government if you don't have the ability to talk to people in confidence." Confidentially, Cheney should have kept his opinions to himself. Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: From: Salman Elarabi 2004-07-06 20:59:55 thank you linda. from the new york times: <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< c.i.a. held back iraqi arms data, officials say by james risen published: july 6, 2004 ashington, july 5 — the central intelligence agency was told by relatives of iraqi scientists before the war that baghdad's programs to develop unconventional weapons had been abandoned, but the c.i.a. failed to give that information to president bush, even as he publicly warned of the threat posed by saddam hussein's illicit weapons, according to government officials. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> r> this is may be true, may be false and more likely to be half the truth, especially the part about not p-ssing that to the oil junta. the arabic proverb that describes this relentless effort by the new york times is: the truth at the service of the mean spirited. From: Linda 2004-07-02 11:50:29 thanks, salman, i appreciate your point of view. From: Salman Elarabi 2004-07-01 20:54:16 former general secretary of the un javier pérez de cuéllar stated that iraq was the aggressor in the iraq-iran war. iraq-iran war was not part of the list of charges against deposed president of the republic of iraq: * killing of religious figures in 1974. * killing of a kurdish clan in 1983. * killing political figures during his reign. * the 1986-1988 anfal campaign against the kurds in northern iraq. * g-ssing the kurds in the northern iraqi town of halabja in 1988. * the suppression of the 1991 uprisings by kurds and shiites. * the 1990 invasion of kuwait. here is the opinion of george galloway on this: *************************** http://w ww.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,2763,1251799,00.htm l the dog that did not bark is the iraqi invasion of iran, with which - lo and behold - saddam is not to be charged. why? because he invaded iran at the behest of the us and britain. he fought the iranian army and attacked the iranian cities - and the civilians within them - with weapons given to him by britain and america and with maps supplied personally by donald rumsfeld. the trial could scarcely cover the invasion of a foreign country by iraq in which a million people died when we would have to be indicted as co-conspirators. **************************** the vital and most important question to all of this: would the success of the us plans for "greater middle east" and its policy in iraq enhance or undermine global justice and world peace? should the people who strive for justice, justice, justice and peace pray for the success of us efforts in (the middle east) arabia or pray that the us fails? out of the subject: a man came to the last prophet of islam (pbuh) and asked him; who is most worthy of my friendship? the messenger of god answered; your mother. the man asked again, who comes next? the prophet said your mother. the man asked again? who comes next? the prophet said your mother. the man asked again? who comes next, the prophet said your father. From: Salman Elarabi 2004-07-01 18:54:49 last week the vice president dick cheney, rudely (underlined), used the 'f' word in the floor of the us senate. today, july 1, 2004, the vp is at it again contradicting the 9/11 senate investigation committee and reiterated the already discounted al-qaeda saddam link. the trial of saddam hussain is being censored by the us in the free and liberated iraq. could that be because they us does not want americans to learn about its involvement in arming saddam and providing him with vital military intelligence during the iran-iraq war where he used chemical weapons against the iranians? or is it because it was a kuwaiti veto to make sure that the argument that kuwait is as part of iraq as vermont is part of the united states does not surface? whatever the reason is, the coming years will prove that there is no similarity between post wwii germany and post april 9, 2003 iraq. in the past i have posted an arabic proverb that describes the vp dick cheney: ************************* a silent fellow; nevertheless, he spits blood and fire when he speaks. ************************** ou t of the subject: the european football (soccer) cup is coming to a close. england, germany, france, italy, holland and a whole lot of football giant nations have been eliminated. it seems that the final match will be between greece and portugal. bravo to the greeks who repeated the saga of the south koreans in the world cup in 2002. From: ac 2004-06-28 17:35:38 this kind of language in any form constitutes a lack of self control and discipline. and for him to have no remorse is sending out a message to our kids and peers that it is alright to use foul language if under pressure. the next thing we can justify is assault because he made me mad and i slapped him. this behavior is inappropriate for the asst cmdr and chief of the us. would you want a man with this lack of self control leading your counrty ? i dont think so!!!! |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |