| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush Truth in Politics Dick Cheney said it. Then he said he didn't say it. Then he said what he said. HE LIED. He lied when he said it, he lied when he said he didn't say, and he lied about what he said he did say. Source: Daily Howler, 2004-06-21 Candidate: Dick Cheney Dick Cheney made a bald misstatement (read that BIG FAT LIE) to Gloria Borger last Thursday when he appeared on CNBC Capitol Report. Clearly, Borger knew that Cheney’s statement was wrong. But did Borger challenge what Cheney said? Please! Her reply to the veep was: “OK!” Cheney appeared on Borger’s show to offer the Administration’s view about ties between Iraq and al Qaeda. At one point, Borger quoted (or tried to quote) something Cheney once said about Mohammad Atta: BORGER: Well, let’s get to Mohamed Atta for a minute because you mentioned him as well. You have said in the past that it was, quote, “pretty well confirmed” From the transcript, it isn’t clear if Borger got to finish her statement. But she was clearly referring to something Cheney said on the December 9, 2001 Meet the Press. Did Atta, one of the 9/11 pilots, meet with Iraqi agents in Prague before 9/11? Here’s what Cheney told Tim Russert: Here comes the first iie: CHENEY (12/9/01): What we now have that’s developed since you and I last talked, Tim, of course, was that report that-it's been PRETTY WELL CONFIMED that HE DID GO TO PRAGUE and HE DID MEET WITH A SENIOR OFFICIAL OF THE IRAQUI INTELLIGENCE SERVICE IN CZECHOSLOVIAKIA LAST APRIL, several months before the attack. Now, what the purpose of that was, what transpired between them, we simply don't know at this point, but that's clearly an avenue that we want to pursue. Clearly, that’s the statement to which Borger referred. But Cheney insisted he hadn’t said it. Here is the fuller exchange: BORGER: Well, let’s get to Mohamed Atta for a minute because you mentioned him as well. You have said in the past that it was, quote, “pretty well confirmed” Here comes lie number two: CHENEY: No, I never said that. BORGER: OK. (Okay? She knows perfectly well he said it!) Here comes lie number three: CHENEY: I never said that. BORGER: I think that -. He lies again for emphasis: CHENEY: Absolutely not. What I said was the Czech intelligence service reported after 9/11 that Atta had been in Prague on April 9 of 2001, where he allegedly met with an Iraqi intelligence official. We have never been able to confirm that nor have we been able to knock it down, we just don't know. Clearly, Cheney was wrong about this. (NO, CLEARLY CHENEY LIED) This week, as we all remember the Presidential Lie "(I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinsky)" that put us all through $73 million manhung culminating in a XXX rated Starr Report, let us all remember that Ms. Lewinsky was a willing, even enthusiastic, participant and that NO ONE DIED AS A RESULT OF THE CLINTON LIE. CAN WE START IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS NOW, PLEASE. Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: From: mccoy@gorge.net 2007-09-16 00:00:00 can they impeach without 60% of the vote? al mccoy |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |