TheTip.org
Username:
Password:

Not a member?
Signup!
Polls Members Refer Forums Write for TheTip! Home Impeach Bush




Impeach George Bush


Why They Did It

There is an aspect of the Abu Ghraib-Gate scandal that has yet to be addressed. And there's a good reason for that: Americans are usually polite people who shrink from causing unnecessary harm or embarassment. However ugly the truth may be, though, it should be told. THOSE GUYS ARE STUPID!!

Source: The TIP, 2004-05-25

Candidate: TheTIP

Think about it. In your mind, picture that little woman, grin on her face, thumbs up. What was she thinking! What was she thinking? NOTHING.

If you put all of the seven accused guards in a room together, you won't find anyone with an IQ over 75. And there has to be a reason for that. How did this bunch get together, chosen to do this job? I believe it was deliberate.

Someone, and it wasn't Karpinski, because her talents don't measure much higher than the seven guards, arranged to put these geniuses together. Then they gave them their instructions. And they did what they were told.

The whole world knows that no one in their right minds would have done the nasty and bizarre stuff this crew did. Any normal person would have been reviled, disgusted, they would have balked, refused to obey. But these bozos not only did it, they photographed it. Smiles and all. Cripes.

I've also got to draw a parallel. Remember that geniusm Commander in Chief, who boasted to the Yale graduating c
lass of 2001, that he was living proof that anyone with a "C" average could become President. You know that 99.9% of the kids and parents in the audience were reviled by that remark. These kids are bright. They worked hard. Their parents were rightfully proud of them. And yet here's this Bozo who never did an honest days work belittling their labors. Making fun of them.

Well, Abu Ghraib is the natural consequence of that kind of thinking. The now famous seven are men and women who, if they were ladies and gentlemen, would have received "gentlemen's C's" had they been at Yale. Just like Bush. And the same people that manipulate our Genius in Chief manipulated the seven guards.

Here's the article:

WASHINGTON -- The top U.S. military officer in Iraq, Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, will be replaced as part of a command restructuring that has been in the works for several months, administration officials said Tuesday. The Pentagon also suspended Brig. Gen. Janis Karpinski from her com
mand.

Both have become symbols of lax supervision at the Abu Ghraib prison where U.S. soldiers allegedly abused Iraqi inmates.

President Bush praised Sanchez during a photo opportunity in the Oval Office. "Rick Sanchez has done a fabulous job," the president said as he met with a group of Iraqis. "He's been there for a long time. His service has been exemplary."

At the Pentagon, Larry Di Rita, chief spokesman for Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, said both Rumsfeld and Joint Chiefs chairman Gen. Richard Myers "are very impressed with the work Gen. Sanchez performed from the very beginning" of his service in Iraq. Sanchez took command there in May 2003.

Regarding suggestions that Sanchez's departure is linked to the abuse scandal, Di Rita said, "That's just wrong."

Karpinski and other officers in the 800th Military Police Brigade were faulted byArmy investigators for paying too little attention to day-to-day operations of the Abu Ghraib prison and for not moving firml
y enough to discipline soldiers for violating standard procedures.

Karpinski's suspension, which has not yet been announced by the Army, was the latest in a series of actions against officers and enlisted soldiers implicated in the abuse scandal at the prison near Baghdad.

Sanchez will be replaced in Iraq in what administration officials said was his scheduled rotation after 13 months of duty there. Gen. George Casey, the Army's No. 2 officer as vice chief of staff, was in line for the post, defense officials said Monday.

Di Rita said, "There has been no final decision" on who will replace Sanchez.

Secretary of State Colin Powell, appearing Tuesday on CBS's "The Early Show," said he had heard the reports but could not say whether Sanchez's departure was in any way related to the prison abuse problem.

Powell did say, however, that "we all knew this was coming about as part of the normal rotation of commanders. General Sanchez has done a terrific job and he's been there fo
r over a year now, so it seems to me in the normal scheme of things."

Last week, Spc. Jeremy Sivits received the maximum penalty of a year in prison and a bad-conduct discharge in the first court-martial stemming from the abuse of Iraqis at the prison. He was among seven members of the 372nd Military Police Company that have been charged.

Karpinski, who has returned to the United States, has not been charged with an offense. Being suspended from her command does not mean she has been relieved of command, so technically she could be reinstated, although the intensity of the international furor over the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse makes that highly unlikely, said the officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.
"I don't know what the grounds are," Karpinski told MSNBC Monday night. "I know that I've been suspended. When I see it in writing, there will be an explanation for it. And what that means is I'm suspended from my position as the commander ofthe 800th Military Police Brigad
e, and they assign me to another position until whatever the reason is, whatever the basis is, is cleared."

In his widely cited investigation report on the Abu Ghraib abuse allegations, Maj. Gen. Antonio Taguba found heavy fault with Karpinski's performance and recommended that she be relieved of command and given a formal reprimand. Instead she was given a less-severe "memorandum of admonishment" on Jan.17 by Sanchez.

Taguba reported that despite the documented abuse of prisoners, he saw no evidence that Karpinski ever attempted to remind the military police in her command of the requirements of the Geneva Conventions, which protect prisoners of war and civilian detainees in times of armed conflict.

Add a comment to this Message in our Forums.
While you're at it, check out our forums too!
Add your Comments to this article
Display Name:


User Originated Comments:


From: mi-3
2004-05-29 17:44:59
the reason you don't believe
that the soldiers
acted on their own is because you are
smart.


watch the whole nick berg
video a few times. look for inconsistencies.



From: CMR
2004-05-26 17:10:11
the military is for men and women that need
structure. they follow orders and do nothing on
their own. i do not believe for a second that
these low ranking enlisted men and women acted on
their own.



Send this article to:
Your Email:

Related News

10-4-2007
Why Hillary and Barack WILLNOT Pledge to End The Occupation
9-23-2007
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”
7-24-2007
Defeat the Beast
7-19-2007
Draft College Republicans
7-4-2007
Libby
7-3-2007
Anyone? Anyone?
7-1-2007
Immigration Bill
5-20-2007
Conserv-a-click Campaign
4-8-2007
Bird Flu Pandemic
4-8-2007
You have Two Choices - Pay me or Pay me
4-6-2006
McKinney? Doyle?
2-28-2005
Evolution of a Nation
2-26-2005
The Resentment Tribe
2-18-2005
Ann Coulter
2-10-2005
The Bomb
1-23-2005
Why the Web
10-16-2004
Reservists Refuse Iraq Mission
10-6-2004
Cheney v Edwards
10-6-2004
Swift Boat Reprise
8-28-2004
Maybe God Should Have The Final Word
8-24-2004
Don't Cha Hate Rumors
8-18-2004
Finishing the Job
8-17-2004
It's Pure Propaganda
8-16-2004
Unintended Consequence?
8-15-2004
Fear Factor
8-11-2004
Lying Liars...You Know
8-11-2004
Where's the Outrage
8-10-2004
On The Stump
8-6-2004
Blessed Are the Peacemakers
8-1-2004
Bush Hater?
7-31-2004
Military Records Controversy
7-31-2004
Moore v O'Reilly
7-26-2004
Why the Media Lied
7-19-2004
Allawi Passes His Initiation
7-9-2004
A WORD ON WORDS
7-2-2004
SADDAM TRIAL
6-28-2004
Repeating History
6-19-2004
Quagmire
6-5-2004
Ode to Mike E, With Aplogies to the Rest of the World
5-12-2004
Outrage
4-30-2004
So Many Scandals, So Little Time
4-6-2004
Paul Wolfowitz to replace Bremer?
4-6-2004
Images of J Edgar
3-1-2004
Let's Start A War
2-20-2004
America's Dysfunctional Government
2-12-2004
Bush Drops THE BOMB
2-9-2004
Congress Goes AWOL
2-4-2004
A First Step in the Intelligence Review
1-19-2004
A Beginning of Evil
11-21-2003
U.S. Military Dismisses Iraq Attacks
11-20-2003
May I Interrupt
11-20-2003
IRAQ HAD NO WMD PROGRAM
11-17-2003
There are Moments
11-4-2003
The TIP Tops the Charts
11-1-2003
Stagflation
10-16-2003
We Can't Do Much, But
10-12-2003
Who Goes to Jail
10-4-2003
Watching the HenHouse
10-2-2003
Novak Faking Naivete
9-19-2003
What the Heck's Going On?
8-29-2003
Out On A Limb
8-29-2003
Diebold Caught In the Act
8-28-2003
8/28 Ringing in My Ears
8-1-2003
A Great Summer Read - Jim Hightower Reminds Us What We've Lost
7-18-2003
Iraq-Gate Claims First Civilian Casualty
2-17-2003
Democracy Dead
7-15-2002
Membership Benefits
7-4-1976
The American Constitution











Donate some Clicks!













This RingSurf The Political Science and Politics Webring Net Ring
owned by TheTIP.

[ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ]

NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org.

Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally.