| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush A First Step in the Intelligence Review We really can't expect the President to do a credible investigation of why he sent American Soldiers to die in an unnecessary war. He won't even ask that question. Source: The TIP, Daily Howler, 2004-02-04 Candidate: TheTIP Bush, who insists he will appoint the investigators, is already drawing the perameters of the investigation - Intelligence Failures - not Administration Failures. Problem is, the "Failures" run the gamut of our entire system. Yes, the President, Vice President, Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense all contributed to this deep hole the world finds itself in. These same men, Bush, Cheney, Powell and Rumsfeld, cannot under any circumstances, be trusted with extricating us from it, either. Congress is cupable, too. The President cannot declare war, only Congress can do that. But this cowardly congress didn't do its sworn constitutional duty. And the press. Watch dogs, right? Not in this case. For reasons only beginning to emerge, the press has also abrigated its responsibility and has yet to do the thorough examination we depend on. Fortunately, there's the internet. Americans with access can still find the truth on the internet. And we are indebted to those patriots who, against the tide, do their civic duty and find the truth. BEING WRONG KEEPS YOU ON: All hail Brian Lamb for having Scott Ritter on Washington Journal last Friday! Ritter did a full thirty minutes on the program, answering questions about WMDs. And wouldn’t you know it? Brian’s first caller, from Philadelphia, asked Scott a very good question: CALLER: Yes, Mr. Ritter. I remember you being interviewed on all the late night cable talk shows and what I remember is you were the only one prior to the war who said that there’s no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. In other words, you’re the only one who was accurate. Why have you all of a sudden disappeared from all these shows? Gosh, for the last year, I’ve wondered what ever happened to Scott Ritter, the only guy who seemed to know what was going on? I’m just wondering whether you were silenced in this regard? Have the networks blacklisted you? Or is there a reason why your opinions aren’t getting proper airplay? Good question! After all, if one observer turns out to be right—and everyone else turns out to be wrong—you’d almost imagine that major news orgs would want to talk to that first guy! But that’s not how it works in this “press corps!” Just so you’ll know, here’s Scott’s answer: RITTER: Well, it’s probably a question best posed to the producers and the bookers at the various television shows and radio talk shows. I’ve always been confident that I’m saying things that are factually sound, based upon the truth, that I’m not spinning them for anyone’s benefit. Unfortunately, I don’t believe the mainstream media acted responsibly in regard to Iraq. Back in the fall of 2002, I was belittled, I was called a traitor, I was called crazy—Paula Zahn of CNN accused me of drinking Saddam Hussein’s Kool-Aid for making accurate statements in response to aluminum tubes and uranium allegedly coming from Niger. I think we have a problem here in that the media is culpable for the misleading of the American public. They bought into the Bush administration’s rhetoric and war fervor, they sold the war to the American public, and now they have to deal with the fact that they’re the ones that were out there beating the war drums and you have this guy, Scott Ritter, who was saying something different and—maybe they just don’t know how to deal with me. I think, though, the facts are on the table and the people who stuck to the facts are the ones who have credibility and hopefully people will realize that, on the issue of Iraq, I have enormous credibility. Say what? Paula Zahn said something like that? Paula Zahn, paid millions to look-good-faking-news? In whose mouth table spread wouldn’t melt? To his great credit, Lamb returned to this question moments later. What shows have you been on in recent weeks? Brian asked. Ritter mentioned a spot with Anderson Cooper, and an earlier CNBC gig. But time out! We decided to do a HOWLER fact-check. How many shows has Ritter been on? You know? Scott Ritter, the guy who got the facts right! According to the Nexis archives, here is Ritter’s total oeuvre over the past six months: 1. Wolf Blitzer Reports, CNN, 1/30/04 (the night of Ritter’s C-SPAN appearance) 2. Anderson Cooper 360 Degrees, CNN, 1/8/04 3. Capital Report, CNBC, 9/30/03 That’s it! You can see how hard your “press corps” has pushed to figure out the real facts on Iraq! Readers, Ritter’s been dumped because he was right. Within this hopeless, Potemkin “press corps,” you only get to stay on the air if you’re conventionally wrong! The people “who stuck to the facts” may have credibility—but they surely aren’t going to get any air time! And by the way, just how will such people get treated when they do end up on TV? It wasn’t just Zahn who was trashing Scott Ritter. Incredibly, here’s the way Gloria Borger previewed that Capital Report session. Words fail when one sees work like this: BORGER (9/30/03): And later: Scott Ritter, the last man in America to defend Saddam Hussein. Why he’s more insistent than ever that there were never any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Stay with us. You’re watching Capital Report on CNBC. Astonishing, isn’t it? But so it goes in this fake, slimy “press corps.” If you’re right, you’re even more of a traitor, and slimy people like Gloria Borger will slime your decency on TV. (By the way: Anyone who has watched Borger’s decline in the past five years will find this comment all too typical.) Faced with this, we pose one question: How long will we, the American people, accept people like Borger at the head of our discourse? How long will we let the Zahns and the Borgers sing the praises of those who were wrong? Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |