TheTip.org
Username:
Password:

Not a member?
Signup!
Polls Members Refer Forums Write for TheTip! Home Impeach Bush




Impeach George Bush


Selling Weapons

Who's going to benefit from this year's warfare? Well, it's been a record year for Russian Arms Manufacturers like Mig.

Source: TheTip, 2003-04-16

Candidate: Big Business

Russia's Defense Industry had a banner year last year with 4.7 Billion in sales by companies like Mig, makers of the only serious competition to american companies Boeing and Lockhead.

But since 1992, the United States has exported more than $142 billion dollars worth of weaponry to states around the world. The U.S. dominates this international arms market, supplying just under half of all arms exports in 2001, roughly two and a half times more than the second and third largest suppliers. U.S. weapons sales help outfit non-democratic regimes, soldiers who commit gross human rights abuses against their citizens and citizens of other countries, and forces in unstable regions on the verge of, in the middle of, or recovering from conflict. 

U.S.-origin weapons find their way into conflicts the world over. The United States supplied arms or military technology to more than 92% of the conflicts under way in 1999. The costs to the families and communities afflicted by this violence is immeasurable. But to most arms dealers, the profit accumulated outweighs the lives lost. In the period from 1998-2001, over 68% of world arms deliveries were sold or given to developing nations, where lingering conflicts or societal violence can scare away potential investors.

Of course, a loss of investment opportunities is not the only way Americans are impacted by the weapons trade. In addition to paying billions of dollars every year to support weapons exports, Americans may also feel the impact of increasing instability overseas. The United States military has had to face troops previously trained by its own military or supplied with U.S. weaponry in Panama, Iraq, Somalia, Haiti, and now in Afghanistan. Due to the advanced capabilities these militaries have acquired from past U.S. training and sales, the U.S. had to invest much more money and manpower in these conflicts than would have otherwise been needed. 

There are few restrictions on whom the government may export arms to. One notable exception is the Leahy Law, which prohibits U.S. military aid or training to foreign military units known to have committed human rights abuses. Under the Pentagon's interpretation of the law, however, these restrictions may be lifted if the foreign government filters out the "few bad apples" in that particular unit. An International Code of Conduct on Arms Sales is also being negotiated with other arms exporters in the hopes of creating a common set of export criteria.
In 2001, total world arms transfer agreements were worth nearly $26.4 billion. The United States led the world with 45.8% of all such agreements. There are two primary channels through which U.S. arms manufacturers sell weaponry to foreign countries: Foreign Military Sales (FMS)and Direct Commercial Sales (DCS).

*

Foreign Military Sales: These are sales of U.S. weapons, spare parts, construction, and related services purchased by foreign governments via the U.S. Department of State . [Data covers actual deliveries of military equipment or services.]



FY2001 total: $12.2 billion (deliveries)
$13.1 billion (new contracts)
FY2000 total: $10.5 billion
$11.4 billion (new contracts)

*

Direct Commercial Sales: These transfers are negotiated directly between the U.S. manufacturing company and the foreign buyers, and approved by the Department of State through the issuance of an export license.



FY2001 totals: $36.3 billion in licenses issued
                             $821.1 million in estimated deliveries*

FY2000 totals: $55.3 billion in licenses issued
                          $477.6 million in estimated deliveries*

Add a comment to this Message in our Forums.
While you're at it, check out our forums too!
Add your Comments to this article
Display Name:


User Originated Comments:


From: The anti bush league
2004-03-12 08:29:13
thanks for this article. i found it very
informative and useful. cheers



Send this article to:
Your Email:

Related News

12-22-2007
Biofuels Could Kill More People Than the Iraq War
9-24-2007
Is Health Care the same as Health Insurance?
11-23-2006
Outsourcing Phase II: Senior Management
6-30-2005
The New York Times
2-10-2005
Universal HealthCare
2-6-2005
Metaphors
1-26-2005
Last but not Least
10-26-2004
KERRY WINS!
10-3-2004
Drug ReImportation Laws Vetoed
8-30-2004
Why We Persevere
6-4-2004
The Employment Game
5-25-2004
Nepotism is Never a Good Idea
2-29-2004
Bush stands there like Alfred E. Neuman, saying, "What, me worry?"
2-29-2004
The MAD MBA
2-27-2004
Where have all the flowers gone? Gone to Iraq, everyone...
2-12-2004
Where Has All the $$$ Gone?
1-27-2004
CBS - SuperBowl Sunday no Freedom of Speech
1-23-2004
Men in Suits
1-22-2004
CBS Gags Your Freedom of Speech
1-21-2004
Privatizing Social Security
1-9-2004
Class Warfare
1-9-2004
Take Back America
12-15-2003
The Capitalist Threat
12-12-2003
Merry Christmas - Ralphs, Vons, Albertsons.
11-25-2003
Carlyle Group Expanding
11-13-2003
Cynics, it's a great time to be alive
11-6-2003
In Case You Missed It
11-3-2003
The Worlds Largest Skimming Operation
10-21-2003
Why Has Our Discourse Fallen Apart? For One Thing, Millionaires Run Your Press Corps
10-17-2003
The Next Banker's Scandal
9-1-2003
G8 Gives Go-Ahead for Iran/North Korea Threats
8-31-2003
Investigate? Why Bother
8-24-2003
What God Told Al Franken
8-1-2003
Iraqi Governing Council
7-24-2003
Operation Oily Immunity
6-19-2003
Bush's Clairvoyance on the Economy
6-9-2003
Don't say no one warned you.
6-6-2003
Don't Say No One Warned You
5-30-2003
Iran, the New Iraq - Propaganda a Prelude to War
5-22-2003
Touchdown, KBR/Cheney Gets the Oil
4-30-2003
FCC - Stop William Powell from letting Major Media Companies Own ALL of the Media
4-28-2003
FCC to Rule on Media Consolidation
4-28-2003
Bankers, Advisers and Traders caught in Biggest Investment Scam EVER
4-23-2003
Lying to the Public - Bush and Nike
4-23-2003
The Crook List
4-22-2003
Who's going to OPEC
4-12-2003
Maxxam / Pacific Lumber Fraud
4-10-2003
America the Jobless and Penniless
4-9-2003
Fox to Acquire Hughes / DirectTV
4-4-2003
60% of 750 People think that Bush is Doing a Great Job
3-21-2003
What Liberal Media?
3-19-2003
Blaming Bush
3-13-2003
Boycott Exxon, Mobil, Shell
3-4-2003
One Hundred Thousand
1-30-2003
DOW DOWN
1-3-2003
Predatory Lending
12-30-2002
Greenspan - Economic Woes and Real Money
12-20-2002
1.4 Billion to Cover The Biggest Conflict of Interest EVER?
11-1-2002
Edison Threatens Legal Action Against Corona using California State Money
9-25-2002
Citigroup Settles Predatory Lending Lawsuit











Donate some Clicks!













This RingSurf The Political Science and Politics Webring Net Ring
owned by TheTIP.

[ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ]

NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org.

Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally.