| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush Feinstein on Kuhl As Bush steps up his attack on the courts, it's time to ask our senators to act. Source: MoveOn.org, 2003-04-03 Candidate: Diane The next judge in the White House's lineup of right-wing extremists, Carolyn Kuhl, is coming up soon for a vote in the Senate. Once again, Senator Dianne Feinstein's vote will be key, and our Senator has not yet taken a position on Kuhl's nomination. Throughout her legal career, Kuhl has followed a legal philosophy harmful to the rights and interests of ordinary Americans. This is particularly true with respect to reproductive freedom, women's rights, and other civil rights. (See below for more information.) It's hard to believe that Senator Feinstein could be on the fence about Kuhl, but she is. Our calls to Senator Feinstein are making a big difference. Please call her again now, at: Washington, DC (202) 224-3841 San Francisco (415) 393-0707 Los Angeles (310) 914-7300 San Diego (619) 231-9712 Fresno (559) 485-7430 Make sure her staff members know you're a constituent, then urge her to: "Please vote AGAINST confirmation for Carolyn Kuhl." Please let us know you're making this call at: http://www.moveon.org/callmade2.html?id=1282-1362987-TeeAUvcrvF15iSYND00owA Keeping a count makes our work more effective. Here's some more information on Carolyn Kuhl's nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, provided by our friends at the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights: * As a judge, Kuhl dismissed a claim brought by a breast cancer patient whose privacy was invaded when a drug salesman who misrepresented his identity participated in her doctor's examination of her breasts. Later, an Appeals Court unanimously found in favor of the plaintiff, reversing Kuhl's decision. * Kuhl's record reveals a troubling tendency to favor corporate interests at the expense of workers and consumers. As a lawyer in private practice, Kuhl argued on behalf of two major defense contractors that the "qui tam" provision of the False Claims Act, which allows private individuals to sue corporations that committed fraud against federal government programs, was unconstitutional. * As a judge, she dismissed a case brought by a woman seeking financial relief under a California law protecting whistleblowers and others acting in the public interest. The California appellate court reversed Kuhl's decision in unusually strong terms, calling it "a nullification of an important part of California's [whistleblower protection] legislation." * Judge Kuhl was one of three Reagan Justice Department officials who persuaded the Attorney General to reverse prior policy and support the granting of tax-exempt status to Bob Jones University, despite its racially discriminatory policies. More than 200 Justice Department lawyers, the Solicitor General, and the Treasury Department General Counsel objected to the change of position for which Kuhl advocated. According to the New York Times (May 1983), Kuhl was one of three characterized as a "band of young zealots" who urged the change in policy. By an 8-1 vote, the Supreme Court rejected Kuhl's position and upheld the IRS denial of tax exempt status to Bob Jones University. Please call Senator Feinstein now and urge her to oppose confirmation for Carolyn Kuhl. For more background on Carolyn Kuhl, see: http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=9590 Some of us who called last week regarding Priscilla Owen were told that Senator Feinstein's opposition to Owen was solid all along. While Senator Feinstein did vote to oppose Owen, our sources confirmed both before and after the vote that her position on Owen had indeed been uncertain, and our 3,000+ calls undoubtedly made a difference. This time, Senator Feinstein's office acknowledged just today that she has not yet taken a position on Kuhl. Those of you following these nominations closely may have noticed that nominees like Owen are being approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee on party lines, despite Feinstein's votes opposing them. Keeping Feinstein in line with the Democrats opposing these right-wing extremists in committee is still crucial, because it makes it possible for Democrats to mount a unified opposition when the nominations reach the Senate floor. The filibuster over the nomination of Miguel Estrada, now holding for its seventh week, despite four Republican attempts to end it, is proof of the importance and power of unity among Democrats. Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |