| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush Pro-Life Democrats - Why the Left Needs Some Moral Superiority I know, Abortion is the Only Issue in the Next Election. I've said it before. It just doesn't matter. War, schmore. Taxes, blaxes. Corruption, schmoruption. We want to hear about dead babies. And it's gonna kill Kerry. Source: Robbie Lindauer, 2004-04-08 Candidate: Robert Lindauer The Republicans have a great history of including all kinds of people - gays, christians, buddhists, blacks, latinos, women, foreigners, hawks, doves, all kinds. It makes them kind of disjointed, but they have this in common - that they put their party first before principle. It's all about winning. So, in the Republican Party, there's the pro-abortion caucus. That's right, the smallish group of people who find that the rest of the party's platform is so attractive, they're willing to put up with the anti-abortion stance. These are people who think that war is just great, that the rich should get richer and the poor poorer, and that abortion is just fine as long as my daughter doesn't do it. You know, the really nice ones. This is the mainstream of the Republican party by the way - the group that, according to GW Bush "isn't ready to outlaw abortion". But Republicans learned long ago that winning was more important than principle. Because winning gets you power and power gets you power. So here you have a hundred years later a political party who's core message of civil liberty, economic freedom and republican solidarity has been so disguised in so many ways to so many people that it's unrecognizable. Asking Republicans for a party platform is like asking Philip Morris for the truth about Cigarette smoking. It ain't gonna happen. Democrats, on the other hand, haven't learned this lesson. Democrats take a specific stand on issues, making them vulnerable to criticism and therefore less likely to attract voters not in their mainstream. They're pro-labor, pro-abortion-rights, anti-gun-rights and anti-war. Well, sometimes. The truth is, their message is a little sloppy too. The TRUTH is, and that is the point isn't it, that neither party gives a flying crapola about any of the issues. They're talking points along a road to one thing - winning. It's sheer, unadulterated us versus them. It's the Star-Bellied Sneetches versus the ones with no stars upon thars. The Bottom Line In the battle between US and THEM, there is no question about who us is on ONE ISSUE and only ONE ISSUE ONLY- Abortion. If the Democrats wanted to have a winning platform, they'd include the anti-abortionists in their fold on the moral basis that it's the poor and underpriveleged that are getting abortions by droves, not the wealthy land-owners. Abortion is a trick being used to get poor people to kill their own children. It's a sad country we live in where people would choose to give up their own children rather than keep them and the Democrats have the answer - Welfare. Holy crackers, Batman, did I say Welfare? Yes, Welfare. Welfare is the tipping point. It's the partof the fabric of our country where we say to a pregnant woman and her family that we as a country will stand by her decision to have her child if she wants. We will support both her and the child if necessary, and we will make it possible for the underpriveleged to have respectable housing, food, clothing and medical care. Period. This is a human rights issue, and we liberals beleive (even us Libertarian Liberals) believe that every human has a right to these things. As with other Democratic-style issues, we're not proposing the brute-force solution of making it illegal to kill babies and death-chairing the doctors that do it. No, we're going to actually TRY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM by addressing it directly. Therefore, Mr. Kerry, I highly recommend you take the advice of the Catholic Church on this one - be Pro-Life. Stand up for what you know is right and how you know you can solve it - by solving the problem, not cauterizing the wound. Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: From: warren buffit 2006-08-06 00:00:00 who is he. From: warren buffit 2006-08-06 00:00:00 From: 2004-11-24 00:37:50 sandra legal or not, abortion is murder! and so is war crimes for all those bush supporters that call themselves moralists on abortion laws but other acts of polical deaths are simply p-ssed on as "business as usual" From: DOINK 2004-11-24 00:21:23 sandra coon can you explain why it is absolutely okay for humans that p-ss through the birth canal to be "free game" to be murdered in war? especially an illegal war? theory here... just make sure that they have had their first few meals and take their dinner plate away along with their young lives. and you're manner of speaking about senior citizens is not thought-out enough. in true comparison to an embryo that is not developed yet and every senior citizen alive that has contributed to helping your living in some way or another either by technology or other intellectual means, why are they disposable? From: Sandra Coon 2004-11-23 23:15:45 ten thousand babies are exterminated daily as a result of legalized abortion! it is reprehensible that an infant, the most valued and perfect of beings, can legally be eliminated at the convenience of that infant's mother! why do we strive to prolong the lives of the elderly and ill and yet willingly kill 10,000 inconveniently conceived and defenseless babies? legal or not, abortion is murder! |
|
Related News
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |