| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() Impeach George Bush WTO - Who's in charge of Collecting Taxes As the WTO attempts to fine the US 4 Billion Dollars (that's about 400 for each of us Americans, payable by our taxes). One wonders what our sovereignty entails? Aren't WE the only body able to levy taxes? Source: TheTip, 2002-09-30 Candidate: WTO WTO Gives EU Go Ahead for Sanctions on US Fri Aug 30,12:52 PM ET By Richard Waddington and Patrick Lannin GENEVA/BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union ( news - web sites) won approval on Friday to slap a record $4 billion in sanctions on the United States over illegal U.S. export tax breaks, scoring a key victory against its giant trading partner. The award, by a special panel of arbitrators at the World Trade Organization ( news - web sites) (WTO), crowned a five-year feud over the U.S. scheme and comes at a time when EU-U.S. trade ties are under the cloud of another bitter battle over steel. But in a sign neither side wants the disputes to get out of hand, the EU said it would hold off from sanctions as it watched the progress Washington made in scrapping the scheme. The United States said President Bush ( news - web sites) was working with Congress to comply with WTO rules and saw the sanctions ruling being made irrelevant by its efforts to change the law. "We find that the amount of $4.043 billion...can be considered to be a reasonable approximation of the actual value of the subsidy," the WTO panel said in an announcement that had been anxiously awaited by both sides for months. The finding is by far the highest level of retaliation authorized since the Geneva-based international trade body was established in January 1995. The Foreign Sales Corp (FSC), as the scheme is called, has benefited such firms as Boeing and Microsoft. The $4.043 billion figure met exactly the EU calculations for trade losses it said companies in the 15-state bloc were suffering as a result of the disputed tax concessions. U.S. officials had argued just under $1.1 billion would be fairer. But the panel said that on the basis of figures provided by the United States, it calculated the annual damage to the EU at $3.74 billion, while the EU's numbers pointed to $5.33 billion -- suggesting it could have awarded Brussels even more. EU SATISFIED, U.S. UPSET "We are satisfied by today's decision that makes the cost of non-compliance with WTO crystal clear," said EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy in a statement. "The arbitrators have endorsed the EU's request, i.e. they have given us an amount of potential countermeasures which will create a major incentive for the U.S. to eliminate this huge illegal export subsidy," he said. His U.S. counterpart was unhappy. "I'm disappointed the (WTO) arbitrator did not accept the lower figure put forward by the United States," U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick said in a statement. "I believe that today's findings will ultimately be rendered moot by U.S. compliance with the WTO's recommendations and rulings in this dispute," he added. Commission trade official Nikos Zaimis said the European Union sought fast implementation of the WTO ruling. "We know that they (United States) have (congressional) elections in November. This is an important date for the future. Of course, we would like to see the U.S. comply before that date," he told a news conference. WTO CHIEF CALLS FOR IMPROVED TRADE TIES The disputes, including one over steel still rumbling on, have come at a time when both the EU and the United States are supposed to be leading global liberalization trade talks. WTO chief Mike Moore, about to step down, called on both sides to get over their conflicts. "I urge both parties to continue to cooperate and work toward resolving this dispute and the others between them in an amicable and constructive fashion," he said. "The EU and the United States are among the most important members of this organization and both hold a special responsibility to ensure the continued health and soundness of (the) WTO and (the) global trading system." The EU has said that before taking any sanctions action, it will consult with European ind Add a comment to this Message in our Forums. While you're at it, check out our forums too! User Originated Comments: From: Jam Asian 2007-07-18 00:00:00 i totally agree with mr.jawed aziz about feudalism as a curse and should be eradicated in order to get rid of poverty from underdeveloped countries. From: Linda 1999-11-30 00:00:00 do i understand this? our government offered american steel industry tax incentives to the tune of $4billion, at tax payers expense. the industry pocketed the money and turned around and made $4billion selling its product to the eu. the eu sued and is now in position to collect $4billion from the us - again, at tax payer expense. is that right? From: JAWED AZIZ 1999-11-30 00:00:00 feudalism is curse. it should be vanished completely from the horizon of earth.because it gives birth to poverty. From: JAWED AZIZ MEMON 1999-11-30 00:00:00 if wto wants to get optimum results of successful trade liberalization it should vow to eradicate feudalism from underdeveloped countires. |
|
Related News |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() owned by TheTIP. [ Skip Next | Next | Random Site | List Sites |Previous ] NEWS | ACTION | RESULTS | POLLS | MEMBERS | SEARCH |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. |
Thetip.org assumes no responsibility for any errors or omissions in these materials. Thetip.org makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. Further, Thetip.org cannot edit, control, review for truth or accuracy, or screen for defamation or obscenity any content provided to the Website by a third party through postings, uploaded files, or any other form of communication, nor can Thetip.org ensure prompt removal of defamatory, obscene, inappropriate or unlawful content after transmission. Any such third party postings, files or other communications do not necessarily represent the opinions, beliefs, or positions of Thetip.org. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the Website, including, without limitation, any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Thetip.org makes no, and expressly disclaims any, warranties, express or implied, regarding the correctness, accuracy, completeness, timeliness, and reliability of the text, graphics, links to other sites and any other items accessed from or via this Website or the Internet, or that the services will be uninterrupted, error-free or free of viruses or other harmful components. Under no circumstances shall Thetip.org, its affiliates, or any of their respective partners, officers, directors, employees, agents or representatives be liable for any damages, whether direct, indirect, special or consequential damages for lost revenues, lost profits, or otherwise, arising from or in connection with this Website, the materials contained herein, or the Internet generally. |